Critics Corner
Positive and Negative Feedback
"I never consider a difference of opinion in politics, in religion, in philosophy, as cause for withdrawing from a friend."
- Thomas Jefferson

"Give me liberty to know, to think, and utter freely, according to conscience, above all other liberties." - John Milton
Home PageCriticsContact UsDonations
The Way of the Master Radio Interview


I am a Ph.D. student at the University of Manchester in the UK, studying the Dead Sea Scrolls and the history of Jewish sacred literature from the Second Temple period. I just listened to Dan Mages dialogue with Todd Friel on WayoftheMasterRadio, which was originally broadcasted on 11 October. I only wanted to write a note to say God bless you and God speed. I can only imagine how frustratingly difficult it must be to attempt to have an intellectual discussion with people who are so wooden in their understanding of God, faith and religion. I was impressed with your candor, your authoritative manner, and your ability to contend reasonably, honestly, and logically in the face of such intransigent ignorance. I just wanted to send you a note, and let you know that I find your work and your ministry refreshing and practically relevant.  Way to go, Dan.  Your Christian brother,

Patrick
Langley, Canada

What a stitch up!  Mr. Friel consistently cut you off, admitted that  he wasn't listening, ignored your previous associations with their  organization, insulted your character (ad hominem attack), accused  you of idolatry, heresy, murder, a lying lifestyle, and denied that the Scriptures might become more clear and understandable when put in  their original social context.  Perhaps one of the more absurd moments of the meeting was that in spite of the absolute clarity of  John 17:3, Friel nonetheless, and in contradiction to his own claims that he reads the bible as it is written, could not articulate his  agreement with Jesus on this point.   Pathetically, when you used his own "trick" on him that if you do something once that it defines your  character, he squirmed and out-talked you until you—perhaps out of the realization that his mic was in fact louder than yours—simply let him talk again. 

Starting around 22'35" when trying to show that  Abraham was question God, he teased you with: "Dude, what's your  hermeneutic?"  He did this to attack the outer witness, in this case  you, and instead of critically approaching the text, he say that  Abraham rather "pleaded with God"—to which I have no idea what he  meant by this. 
I am encouraged each time I hear you talk to these various people and are able to remain on topic—even when being diverted off topic by the host in the amount of four or five minutes.  How you stay focussed, ignoring would-be personal attacks, suggests to me to that you have an understanding of the kinds of tricks people will try to play on you to get you flustered with the hopes that be they successful, they might gain an upper-hand by showing that you can't control yourself.  Yet this never happens.  Jesus was like this in this regard.  I appreciate how you used comprehension checks and confirmation checks with Friel to assess whether or not he was listening to you, which when you stated, "you're not listening to me" he agreed.  Your overall character was minimized before you ever came on.  Friel, talking to the woman, said, "where you do you find these guys?"  This was to depreciate your self-worth; in essence he was judging you self righteously.  He sneered about your education, and then, having the advantage of being able to talk about you without your response, was able to assure his listeners that you were for certain off the mark. But, he has a GM that needs him to keep the show punchy so that advertisers will pay, and listeners will listen. 

Thomas
Pasadena, CA


I just got through listening to your (Dan's) interview on Sirius 'way of the master radio'.  And I had to run back to work and email you because I am respecting of your opinions and your quest for truth wherever it may be.  I agree that Jesus is the Son of God and are separate beings but are united in purpose for the salvation of all of God's children.  The concept of the Trinity is just plain confusing and God does not want to confuse us, His truths are plain and precious...I believe that all faiths have some truth and if you are truly hungering for truth and humble enough to accept it... Again, I enjoyed your interview, at least your side of it.  Please let me know why you have to believe in the 'Trinity' to be considered a Christian?

Bob
Queen Creek, AZ

My wife Bonnie and I listened last night to the radio interview you did on Way of the Master radio.  I just wanted to tell you that I think you ARE a good guy!  That host acted pretty rudely in my opinion.  Had I been in your shoes . . . I would have been eaten alive by that guy.  You did really well at fending off his attacks and insinuations that you're not saved.  I'm sure it's one of those things where, in hindsight, there were other responses to things that may have been given - but the pressure you're under in that situation is absolutely brutal.  Keep it up Dan.  You're an influence in the movement of seeking truth.  And you're participating in the fellowship of the sufferings of Christ - who also was mocked publicly.  Congratulations for being counted worthy.
 
Matthew 5:11 "Blessed are you when people insult you and persecute you, and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me."

David
Albuquerque, NM
 

Heard the podcast - I wish it could have focused more on the trinity issue.  Unfortunately he cornered you and "guilt by association" you (i.e. "if you don't agree with me about this one issue, your wrong on every issue").  I definitely think he is ignorant on certain facts though.  I thought your comment about that during our time we have the most information available concerning the biblical times than we ever have - so in that respect we do know more than those in the middle ages using the latin vulgate.  But in his radio world none of that matters.

John

This Todd Friel guy is an idiot! He started right off into trying to trap Dan into a non-Christian corner by semantically trying to direct Dan's answers. Dan's status before God does NOT depend on whether he gives Todd Friel the answers to questions that Todd Friel expects. He was not the least interested in hearing Dan's position, but only in trying to humiliate Dan in front of the listening audience.  No, this discussion doesn't annoy me, it makes me angry! I'm about 3/4 of the way through it and I'm not sure if I can stand to finish it.

Bev

What I did not like about the debate was that BOTH of you were fluffing and pumping your own perspective selves and not allowing the other to listen and then respond (I admit that doing such during a specific frame of time – on radio - is very difficult).  Frankly, I think you both had good points.

Gordon
Northhampton, MA